Franchot to Hogan: ‘Stop the manipulation of science for political purposes’


For months there had been large discrepancies between the coronavirus positivity charges reported by the State of Maryland and Johns Hopkins College.

The seven-day rolling common charges reported by the Maryland Division of Well being had been on common considerably decrease than that of these reported by the world-famous medical establishment.

Then in mid-October, the hole between the 2 charges started to shut.

“My understanding of the reasoning behind this abrupt change in calculation is as a result of the COVID Monitoring Undertaking-a web site managed by The Atlantic dedicated to gathering nationwide COVID-19 information-changed the way it maps Maryland’s information to now embrace all viral exams carried out, together with a number of exams on the identical particular person,” Comptroller Peter Franchot wrote in a letter to Gov. Larry Hogan and Well being Secretary Robert Neall on Thursday. “The results of a bigger denominator is a smaller positivity charge. As a consequence of adjustments in information shared by the Maryland Division of Well being to the COVID Monitoring Undertaking, Johns Hopkins was pressured to change the way in which they calculated the speed.”

A Hogan spokesman and Neall flatly denied Franchot’s prices.

Franchot informed on Friday that he has realized that members of the Hogan administration relayed to Hopkins employees their disapproval of how the establishment had beforehand calculated the state’s positivity charge.

“We referred to as Hopkins and spoke to the epidemiologists and it grew to become very clear that there had been a months-long marketing campaign by the Hogan administration to browbeat Hopkins into altering their positivity charge calculations in order that they’d not be completely different from the State of Maryland’s.”

Franchot elaborated on that time, saying that Hopkins employees relayed to him that administration officers mentioned Hogan was offended in regards to the discrepancy in information between the 2 entities.

Franchot referred to as on each Hogan and Neall to: “Cease the manipulation of science for political functions.”

Franchot mentioned makes an attempt by state officers to undermine the credibility of Hopkins’ reporting may have nationwide repercussions as a result of Hopkins is considered the gold normal on well being points.

Franchot reiterated a request from his Thursday letter for the state to vary its reporting strategies.

“My request to everyone is eliminate the time period positivity charge. It’s not with out value-positivity charges and their computations-but they need to be used internally by epidemiologists….The variety of circumstances per 100,000 inhabitants is one thing that’s easy and really troublesome to meddle with and offers the general public some barometer of the place we’re in phrases the well being concern. However to say proper now that we’re doing a lot better than different states is unsuitable.”

Hogan’s communications director, Mike Ricci, rebuked Franchot and referred to as on the comptroller to apologize to the state’s medical consultants.

“Frankly, the Comptroller owes an apology to the state’s workforce of epidemiologists. That is no method to deal with scientists who’ve been working across the clock for months to supply correct and dependable info to our residents. He shouldn’t be disparaging our public well being consultants–he must be thanking them.”

Secretary Neall flatly denied Franchot’s claims in a press release to

“The Comptroller’s understanding of how our public well being consultants calculate the state’s official information is inaccurate. Our workforce of epidemiologists has constantly reported the state’s positivity charge the identical manner, primarily based on the identical methodology utilized by the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC). Our consultants haven’t any involvement in how different entities calculate their information, and will not be influenced by political components. It’s essentially irresponsible to counsel in any other case.”

Leave a Reply